Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reviews. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Review: The Seas by Samantha Hunt

Rating: 4.5 stars
Recommended for: humans, particularly those who enjoyed the style of The Stranger, the characters of Rebecca, and the magic of Pan's Labyrinth



Wow.

I'm surprised that this book isn't more well known; it has so many delicious elements. Folk stories mixing with modern life, magical realism mixing with fantasy (which is it?), clinical insanity mixed with the "normal" insanity of which everyone has their own peculiar brand.

This is the story of a teenager, living in a rundown, and her attempts to have a relationship with an older man who just wants to be friends. Years ago, her father walked into the ocean, and never came back - which of course means that the two of them are mermaids, because he couldn't be dead. This shapes the way she sees the world: she can't wait for global warming to melt the ice caps and send everyone who has been cruel to her into the depths; she knows the stories about mermaids who must kill the mortal men who don't return their love, and she's terrified that she will have to kill the man she loves. All this is told a stream-of-consciousness style, where the past pervades the present and words can have many meanings. And, of course, our narrator is unnamed - how could she be anything else?

Thursday, January 8, 2015

Review: Transcendence by Shay Savage

Rating: 5 stars
Recommended for: ANYONE WITH A SOUL

Oh my god. 

I heard about this book on teh Booktubez and thought it sounded worth an investigation. All the reviews on goodreads encouraged me, and I decided to read the first few pages of the preview, just to make sure I liked the writing style so I could add it to my TBR. So, I read the first few pages. Then the next few. Then the preview ran out. Then I downloaded it. Then I had to go to laundry which is the worst thing that has ever happened in my entire life. Then I went back to reading. Then I had sex with my husband to show him that I appreciate his willingness to protect me from wild boar. Then I finished the story. 

This process began about 11 hours ago. What I saying is this book is amazing and you need to read it. Here's why:

1st person romance... FROM THE MAN'S PERSPECTIVE: 10 points
Psycholinguistics geekfest: 1 point and 1 bonus point for cementing in my brain which one is Broca's area and which is Wernicke's.
Making me understand the caveman better than the modern woman: 1 point
Elucidation of relationships: 5 points
Dozens of uses of the word "penis," none of which made me uncomfortable: dozens of points
Possibly inventing the genre of historicalscifantamance: 1 point
DAT EPILOGUE THOUGH: ALL THE POINTS

There was a period around the 3/4 mark where I feared I would have to lower my rating to four stars because things got weird and not super sense-maky, but now I must say 20 "Hail Mary's" to atone for my sin of not putting my faith Ms. Savage because that epilogue, guys. That. Epilogue.

You win, madam, you win.

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Review: Summerfall and Winterspell by Claire Legrand

Ermahgerd, you guys.  These books have made me realize how boring my life is.  Most of the novels I read fall into one of two categories:

  1. Slow, contemplative stories, with a big focus on character development and a touch of mystery, like The Meaning of Night or My Cousin Rachel
  2. Stories based on witty and clever insights more than plot, with fairly blatant social or moral commentary, like A Series of Unfortunate Events or the Discworld novels
But Winterspell was an action-packed, fast-paced, emotional roller coaster.  I often found myself thinking, "Oh my, somebody's getting punched - this is quite exciting!" like the 80-year British lady that I am, deep down.


 
Series rating: 4.5
Recommended for: potential fantasy fans who are afraid of getting bored by world building
Summary: Winterspell is an adaptation of the Nutcracker story, mostly taking its cues from the ballet.  Clara Stole is the daughter of the mayor of New York City at the close of the nineteenth century.  Her father seriously needs to get his act together because he has gotten in way over his head with the city's crime syndicate that probably brutally murdered his wife.  Fortunately, Clara is learning how to kick ass from her godfather.  Then, on Christmas eve, basically everything bad thing that could happen happens, and Clara ends up in a far away land that makes NYC and its mob look like the county fair.  Now our heroine must fight to save her father, and apparently help restore the prince to the throne (who as it turns out, is an actual alive and sometimes naked person, and not a dreamy statue), although that's really not why she came here, guys.
Summerfall tells the story of the parents of Winterspell's villain, and provides some necessary background on the land of Cane.  Get ready for a lot of forbidden love and a lot of racism.


So, first things ...er... second, at this point: what order should you read these books in?  Normally, I read prequels after the original, but Summerfall was published several weeks before Winterspell, and I took this as a hint from Ms. Legrand that it should be read first, and I'm glad I took the hint.  Winterspell is the story of a kingdom that has gone to hell, so you'll appreciate the degradation and misery so much more if you have something to compare it to.  Alternately, you could read the Part One of Winterspell, which is set entire in New York and not in our fantasy world, then go read Summerfall and learn about Cane, then return to Winterspell.  But you have to promise me that you'll be able to stop reading at the end of Part One - it will be difficult to resist. The  world of Summerfall is basically straight-up fantasy, with your magic and your elves, but Winterspell is more of a hybrid of fantasy and stempunk; you've still got the magic, but there's also video cameras, railways, and drugs.  Just imagine a fantasical early Renaissance setting where Leonardo da Vinci turned evil and took over the world.  Awesome sauce, right?

But the awesome does not stop there.  Claire Legrand gets some many point from me because this series has an LGBT element.  As a bisexual lady, one of my favorite things is when an artist can craft a protagonist who has meaningful and plot-related romantic relationships with people of different genders (see also: Thirteen in House M.D. and Damisa in Ancestors of Avalon - although the rest of that book was crap, so maybe not worth it.)  This type of exploration was perfect for Winterspell because it is about sexual awakening and be assertive with your sexual sovereignty (to go all English professor-y for a moment), and limiting that it heterosexuality can cripple the impact.

I'm sure some of you are interested in this series because you love the ballet and you're wondering: how does this compare? I used to be a dancer, and have performed the role of Clara (or "Marie" in our production), so I consider myself qualified to answer this question.  As you may know, the last two thirds of the ballet are basically plot-free, so Claire Legrand had the opportunity to go crazy.  The main constant between the two interpretations is the character of Drosselmeyer - he was spot on for me: eye-patch, interested in mechanics, loving to his god-daughter, and also not at all pedophile-y, as it can be played (we've got a whole other character to be the creepy sex-offender).  The rest of the story was either original or heavily adapted.  Our big bad is not the Mouse King, also some R.O.U.S's do show up at midnight on Christmas eve.  Cane isn't populated by candy, but everyone is addicted to sugar.  And the one that makes me the tiniest bit sad: Nicholas is in no way a nutcracker.  He was a statue for quite a while, couldn't he have falled over at some point and cracked open a walnut someone had left on the floor?  Could he like to eat nuts?  I'd take anything, really.


But that's not enough to drop my rating, so por que no 5 stars?  None of these issues would prevent me from recommending this series, but I do wish to document my grievances for future writers.
  1. I got the impression that Summerfall was meant to be a full novel.  Scenes would be flowing along smoothly, and then all of a sudden I'd run into "Three months later..." and I couldn't help but think "really, did nothing interesting happen to our characters in those three months?"
  2. Winterspell suffers slightly from what I call the "born to die" problem.  We get introduced to some characters fairly late in the book, and quickly get some character building thrown at us so that we feel sad when they die.  I always say, either have the balls to kill off some main characters or trust the reader to have the compassion to feel sad when some random bloke dies, if you really do need to show some death.
  3. As Winterspell progressed I noticed some things about our male romantic interest, Nicholas.  He spent about 15% of his screen time, as it were, doing interesting, plot-advancing things, another 15% doing or threatening really horrible things to our protagonist, and the other 70% apologizing profusely to her and saying that he knows she has no reason to trust him, but he would never hurt her again even if it kills him.  So, get ready for a several pages of that toward the end.

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Review: Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

This review contains some spoilers but nothing that isn't common knowledge.
 
Rating: 3.5 stars
Recommended for: Science fiction scholars, fans of Emily Brontë, people trying to get into Victorian literature

With a book as well-known as Frankenstein, it’s impossible to leave your impressions at the door before you start reading.  Years of seeing the characters in movies and TV shows has given me all kinds of assumptions about this novel.  So the first thing that everyone needs to know is that Victor Frankenstein is in his early 20's for most of the book - what the what, you guys!  As a sympathetic fellow twenty-something, I give him a full pass on not having his act together.

Mary Shelley's work suffers only mildly from that famous Victorian flaw: Too Many Words (I'm looking at you, Charles Dickens).  You are going to have to sit through a couple pages of framing device before you get to Victor's story, and then Shelley will occasionally wax poetic about Swiss mountains.  The only section that I really would have trimmed is the story of the De Lacey family.  I appreciate the importance of monster's gradually education and socialization, but since those characters had no long-term payoff and disappointingly anti-climactic short-term payoff, I could have done with quite a bit less.

And that brings me to my main complaint with Shelley's writing.  She has no sense of climax.  All of the iconic moments - the monster coming to life, his first encounter with Frankenstein, the death of Elizabeth - I hardly noticed that they were happening.  So, while neither action-packed nor spine-tingling, Frankenstein is a thought provoking novel that is fairly easy to get through.  I'd say go for it.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Review: File Under: 13 Suspicious Incidents by Lemony Snicket

First of all, let me state that I am not addicted to the works of Lemony Snicket; I can stop whenever I want. I just don't want to right now.

18295854

3.5 stars
Recommended for: Snicket fans, those nostalgic for middle school, readers with short attention spans

This is a charming collection of short mystery stories. Not charming like Gob Bluth, but charming like a little boy all dressed up in a suit with a big smile. They are light, cute, and undemanding. I was able to solve about half of the 13 incidents before turning to the conclusions in Sub-File B, but you shouldn't be in here for highly-developed puzzlers. That's what Agatha Christie is for. No, you are in here to hang out with your friends Lemony, Moxie, Jake, and Dashiell, as well as some other people, like the Mitchums. 

I'm pretty sure that this book isn't required reading for the All the Wrong Questions series - we don't make any progress on the Hangfire case, or what Ellington is up to, or what the S. stands for. But if you are positively apoplectic waiting for Shouldn't You Be in School?, this should quench your thirst for wit and wild hair - at least until the final story, which will make you sit straight up and stare penetratingly into the page, trying to extra every morsel of information that Snicket might be sending you, and then stare penetratingly at the calendar, since the power of your mind can most surely make September 30 arrive sooner. Surely.